The Bellator and Eddie Alvarez mess!

UFC, Bellator MMA, Invicta FC, DREAM, ONE FC, MFC and more!
Forum rules
User avatar
broncofan
Captain
Captain
Posts: 4118
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 6:07 pm
Location: Death Star

The Bellator and Eddie Alvarez mess!

Postby broncofan » Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:11 pm

Bjorn Rebney on Eddie Alvarez Contract: “We Matched Every Single Element of (the UFC Deal)”

http://www.mmaweekly.com/bjorn-rebney-o ... e-ufc-deal

It appears things might get worse before they get better in the ongoing contract negotiation between Bellator Fighting Championships and former titleholder Eddie Alvarez.

Alvarez finished out the final fight on his Bellator contract in October, but while he was able to negotiate with other promotions, Bellator still had the option to match terms and try to re-sign him.

The Philadelphia based fighter did indeed receive a contract offer from the UFC not long ago, and days later Bellator opted to match it.

“I’ve got wild respect for Ed. In our contract with Ed, exactly like the UFC has in their contracts, we have the right to match. Ed went out and got an offer from the UFC, and we took a look at that offer, reviewed it for about eight days, and decided to match it dollar for dollar, deal point for deal point, term for term,” Bellator CEO Bjorn Rebney told MMAWeekly Radio on Monday.

“We matched every single element of it, word for word.”

Rebney went on to explain how the matching rights work, something they had the option with not long ago when former middleweight champion Hector Lombard finished out his contract with the promotion and ultimately signed with the UFC.

“The way that the matching rights work under our agreement, and the UFC agreements work, the good way to look at it is looking at the Ed situation and the Hector situation. In Hector’s situation, just like Ed’s, he had an ability to go out and get an offer from the UFC. When that offer comes back, we have to make a decision – we can either match it dollar for dollar, deal point for deal point, offer for offer, term for term, or we cannot,” Rebney explained.

“If we say we match that means everything Ed or Hector were guaranteed in the UFC deal, they have to be provided in the Bellator deal. So if it’s guaranteed in their deal, it has to be guaranteed in our deal. In the Hector deal, we took a look at it and made a business decision and said we don’t think we can monetize that situation; we don’t think it’s the best move for the company. In the Ed situation, we looked at it in a different way.”

Alvarez has been with Bellator for almost four years and fought a total of nine times over his tenure with the promotion. He was also their first ever lightweight champion and held the title until November 2011 when he was defeated by current titleholder Michael Chandler.

As Bellator moves to Spike TV this year, Rebney hoped to have Alvarez as a cornerstone with their organization, and even hinted at the possibility of doing a rematch with Michael Chandler at some point in the future if they came to terms on a contract.

According to Rebney, for now, the ball is in Alvarez’s court on signing the deal he says they matched dollar for dollar and guarantee for guarantee with the UFC’s offer.

“At this point, it’s been matched. We’ve submitted the matched contract, which is what we’re required to do under our agreement with Ed, to Ed, and we’ll see what happens from here. My hope against hope is that it is an amicable situation that works well and Ed ends up back in our cage in short order, and there’s some incredible fights out there for him,” said Rebney.

“It literally just comes down to you look at the contract and you say ‘yes, I will give you every single thing that is guaranteed in that contract you got for the UFC.’ That’s what we’ve done.”

Rebney says he’s not sure how long this situation could draw out. Alvarez disputed Bellator’s matching terms during an interview on Monday, and later said via Twitter that he believes the matching rights are for one year. He did comment further answering that he would be willing to fight for Bellator again saying, “I’m okay with that, just want things to be fair.”

“We matched the deal, and literally just signed it and sent it to him. Because that’s what our contract requires us to do, we matched it and sent it to him signed. So if he were to send it back signed, we’d be off and running and we could start looking at scheduling; we could start figuring out what’s next immediately,” said Rebney.

“If he chooses not to sign it, it depends on where it goes from there. There’s a lot of different paths that can be followed from that point forward. My hope is I’ve had a great relationship with Ed for four years, he’s going to make a lot of money with Bellator coming up, and we’ll see where this goes from here.”
Image

User avatar
keithlewis
CAGESLAYER
CAGESLAYER
Posts: 10586
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:49 pm
Location: At the No Name Bar playing Golden Tee

Re: The Bellator and Eddie Alvarez mess!

Postby keithlewis » Wed Jan 09, 2013 6:59 pm

The saga continues....

http://www.mmajunkie.com/news/2013/01/e ... r-view-cut

If Eddie Alvarez frees himself from Bellator, he stands not only to become an immediate UFC lightweight title challenger but also to profit handsomely from pay-per-view sales.

But if he stays with Bellator, the 28-year-old fighter won't be in the poorhouse, either.

A UFC contract offers Alvarez an immediate title shot in March and a cut of the promotion's pay-per-view profits, according to an exhibit in a lawsuit Bellator MMA filed against the 28-year-old fighter, a copy of which today was obtained by MMAjunkie.com (www.mmajunkie.com).

An eight-fight deal starts Alvarez at $70,000 to show and $70,000 to win and raises in $5,000 increments with each win until it tops out at a guaranteed $205,000 for a win, the exhibit states. Alvarez is also guaranteed a $250,000 signing bonus, payable in two installments of $85,000 and one of $80,000.

When Alvarez fights on a UFC pay-per-view broadcast, the offer entitles him to $1 for each "buy" between 200,000 and 400,000 buys, $2 per buy between 400,000 and 600,000 buys, and $2.50 per buy over 600,000 buys.

Additionally, Alvarez is guaranteed a fight on a UFC on FOX card and three appearances as a commentator at UFC-branded events.

The exhibit confirms a previous claim from Bellator CEO Bjorn Rebney that his promotion merely changed window dressings on the UFC's offer. Mentions of UFC parent company Zuffa are simply crossed out and replaced with Bellator.

It also shows Bellator offered three additional bonuses to Alvarez when Bellator decided to match the UFC's offer. Included was a $25,000 payout for participating in a behind-the-scenes show filmed by Bellator broadcast partner Spike TV, a $100,000 payout for a head coach position on the second season of Bellator's reality show, and a guest host spot on Spike TV's "Road to the Championship" program.

And Alvarez stood to receive a $250,000 signing bonus upon re-upping with Bellator.

The deals are the same – on paper. But Bellator and Alvarez disagree on their value, and they've taken their cases to the court of public opinion.

Before they did that, though, they sued each other.
Image

User avatar
BongUser
Crossing Guard
Crossing Guard
Posts: 29
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:58 am

Re: The Bellator and Eddie Alvarez mess!

Postby BongUser » Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:05 pm

Timeline

Oct. 12, 2012: Alvarez knocks out Patricky "Pitbull" Freire at Bellator 76, which, according to the promotion, falls on or about the day his exclusive, 90-day negotiating period begins. Alvarez and Rebney meet afterward to discuss a possible new contract; Alvarez agrees to meet with Viacom execs to discuss details.

Nov. 1, 2012: Bellator notifies Alvarez that it has waived the fighter's exclusive negotiating period, which allows him to field a new offer solely from the UFC within the 90-day period.

Nov. 14, 2012: The UFC notifies Alvarez of a $250,000 signing bonus, payable in three installments, to be guaranteed upon signing a new promotional agreement.

Nov. 28, 2012: Alvarez attorney Neil Tabachnick forwards a UFC promotional agreement to Bellator and reminds the promotion it has 14 days to match the deal.

Dec. 11, 2012: Bellator and Spike TV formally announce a new broadcast deal. During a media conference call, Rebney says the promotion doesn't have "definitive plans to do a pay-per-view."

Dec. 13, 2012: Bellator sends Alvarez's attorney two versions of its matching offer, which includes a signing bonus and three additional ancillary opportunities for the fighter, who is asked to sign the deal.

Dec. 14, 2012: Alvarez's lawyer calls Bellator and asks for assurances that the fighter's next bout will be on PPV.

Dec. 16, 2012: Tabachnick notifies Bellator that it has failed to match Zuffa's offer in several "material and meaningful respects" and claims the fighter is free to sign with the promotion on Dec. 19.

Dec. 18, 2012: In an email to Tabachnick, Bellator argues that it has matched Zuffa's offer and threatens legal action if Alvarez doesn't sign.

Dec. 31, 2012: Bellator files suit against Alvarez in New Jersey federal court while alleging breach of contract and tortuous interference from five unnamed parties. (The complaint is logged on Jan. 3, 2013.)

Jan. 4, 2013: Alvarez files suit against Bellator in New Jersey state court and asks for declaratory relief and an injunction against the promoter.

Jan. 7, 2013: Alvarez reveals to MMAFighting.com Bellator ia suing him, after which Rebney gives multiple interviews in which he reveals several terms of the Zuffa contract Bellator claims it matched.


http://www.mmajunkie.com/news/2013/01/h ... g-lawsuits


Return to “Mixed Martial Arts News and Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests