Knockout or submission?

UFC, Bellator MMA, Invicta FC, DREAM, ONE FC, MFC and more!
Forum rules
User avatar
keithlewis
CAGESLAYER
CAGESLAYER
Posts: 10586
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:49 pm
Location: At the No Name Bar playing Golden Tee

Postby keithlewis » Mon Dec 17, 2007 6:34 pm

KNOCKOUT!!
Image

Make_Believe_Muscle
Traffic Cop
Traffic Cop
Posts: 97
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 12:38 pm
Location: Midgar, New York

Postby Make_Believe_Muscle » Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:02 pm

tuco wrote:i would say i like both way of finishing very much :wink:



I agree!!

User avatar
mcnamara
The Mexican Judge
The Mexican Judge
Posts: 183
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 10:12 am
Contact:

Postby mcnamara » Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:33 pm

Both can be very exciting but a KO makes people go crazy!!! :D
Just a minor step back, we'll get over it

User avatar
ArmyofDarkness
Babes 'n Stuff Post King
Babes 'n Stuff Post King
Posts: 2719
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:46 pm

Postby ArmyofDarkness » Mon Mar 03, 2008 2:56 pm

AFTER SILVA'S VICTORY ON SATURDAY, I WILL TAKE SUBMISSION!
Image

User avatar
Beam&Coke
FORUM ADMIN
FORUM ADMIN
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: Denver

Postby Beam&Coke » Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:08 am

If you submit them in a manner that allows for a free T-bagging after the fight I am all for it...but from what I have seen the only way to really finish someone in a manner that leaves you the king of ring you better K.T.F.O. as my friend Westwood said.
It's your father and I have been drinking!!

Image

User avatar
Natedawgtham
Crossing Guard
Crossing Guard
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:35 pm
Location: New Providence PA

Postby Natedawgtham » Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:14 pm

I like submissions better. I have lost love for KO's since every time people say a "guaranteed KO" like Chuck/Wandy and then UFC 76 "Knockout" which had none! Their all disappointments!

I rather see Big Nog get the hell beat out him and two seconds later, lock on a triangle or andaconda rather then see Chuck run around the ring for 2-3 rounds waiting for his opponent to run into something!

So I go submissions, since they don't rely on a lucky punch as much as knockouts do, submissions is just pure, slick technique!

User avatar
TheBrokenVow
FORUM ADMIN
FORUM ADMIN
Posts: 692
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 9:51 pm
Location: FLA
Contact:

Postby TheBrokenVow » Fri Apr 04, 2008 12:06 am

Natedawgtham wrote:I like submissions better. I have lost love for KO's since every time people say a "guaranteed KO" like Chuck/Wandy and then UFC 76 "Knockout" which had none! Their all disappointments!

I rather see Big Nog get the hell beat out him and two seconds later, lock on a triangle or andaconda rather then see Chuck run around the ring for 2-3 rounds waiting for his opponent to run into something!

So I go submissions, since they don't rely on a lucky punch as much as knockouts do, submissions is just pure, slick technique!


Submissions can rely on luck just as much as strikes...

User avatar
Natedawgtham
Crossing Guard
Crossing Guard
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:35 pm
Location: New Providence PA

Postby Natedawgtham » Fri Apr 04, 2008 1:33 am

I'm not so sure about that. Any one strike can knock somebody out. Shoot, Chuck knocked Vernon White out with a jab. All you really do is throw a strike and a fight can end instantly, and I guess time it right sometimes too.

But with a submission, you got to set it up most the time. You have to force your opponent into a bad spot, or be able to see it clearly, Submissions take more technique.


Return to “Mixed Martial Arts News and Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests