Yin & Yang - Moral problems of winning By Machinemen
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:33 pm
Yin & Yang - Moral problems of winning By Machinemen
The main idea is to show a moral problem of something. Like suicides, drugs, killing or whatever. I ended up trying something extreme and showing the moral problems of winning. The idea is like what you are really willing to do to someone else in order to achieve victory, and what achieving it actually means.
It kind of shows the hedonism of seeing other people lose.
Basically these terms you need to know. We needed to show some different moral theories and show why they are used wrong in the subject we decide.
utilitarismi - utilitarianism
altruismi - altruism
Sopimus etiikka - reciprocal agreement (We have written rules, usually law, which we should agree obey. If not, it's morally wrong.
Synti - Sin
John Rawls - part is his theory that anyone who is economically in a weaker state should always be though first.
Then there's egoismi and probaganda but you know what they mean.
The main message is kind of like "the idea of winning is getting pleasure of taking it away from someone else". Which is something that is wrong in the moral terms I use and others that I have only showed in picture. This is a video that might be hard to get but I hope you understand my main idea. .
WATCH
http://punchdrunkgamer.com/the-moral-pr ... achinemen/
DESCARGAR / DOWNLOAD
http://machinemen.skyrock.com/
The main idea is to show a moral problem of something. Like suicides, drugs, killing or whatever. I ended up trying something extreme and showing the moral problems of winning. The idea is like what you are really willing to do to someone else in order to achieve victory, and what achieving it actually means.
It kind of shows the hedonism of seeing other people lose.
Basically these terms you need to know. We needed to show some different moral theories and show why they are used wrong in the subject we decide.
utilitarismi - utilitarianism
altruismi - altruism
Sopimus etiikka - reciprocal agreement (We have written rules, usually law, which we should agree obey. If not, it's morally wrong.
Synti - Sin
John Rawls - part is his theory that anyone who is economically in a weaker state should always be though first.
Then there's egoismi and probaganda but you know what they mean.
The main message is kind of like "the idea of winning is getting pleasure of taking it away from someone else". Which is something that is wrong in the moral terms I use and others that I have only showed in picture. This is a video that might be hard to get but I hope you understand my main idea. .
WATCH
http://punchdrunkgamer.com/the-moral-pr ... achinemen/
DESCARGAR / DOWNLOAD
http://machinemen.skyrock.com/